How I work.
A two-gate intake and one arc: a written mechanistic re-read of the case, translated into a personalized intervention framework for your medical team.
Six steps, each bounded before it starts.
Nothing is charged until fit is confirmed in writing after Gate 1.
- 01
Gate 1 fit screen
Free · about 5 minutes
A short written summary of the case. Every submission receives a written reply: accepted, or declined with the reason. No files and no payment.
- 02
Records and full intake
If accepted
Medical records, prior labs, imaging, current medication and supplement regimen, and a structured timeline.
- 03
Mechanistic reconstruction
Before the session
The record is read closely and rebuilt as one system: competing explanations, contradictions and leverage points.
- 04
Live working session
60–90 minutes, by video
The interpretation is tested against your lived experience and refined with what does not appear in records.
- 05
Written synthesis and framework
Within 10 business days
Personalized intervention framework — including prioritized targets, phased sequencing, supplement/nutrient options and specific product examples when relevant — prepared for review with your medical team.
- 06
Clarification
4 weeks by email
Questions about the delivered analysis. Your clinicians decide what is appropriate, authorise it, and supervise anything acted on.
From records to a causal reading.
The same canvas is used for every case: what arrived, how it was reconstructed, and what is written up at the end.
What arrives
- Prior labs and imaging, in original form
- Medication, supplement, and antimicrobial history
- Symptom timeline with onset and inflection points
- What has already been tried, and what happened
Nothing is discarded for being inconvenient. Contradictory findings are kept on the canvas.
How it is read
- Findings mapped onto Host Capacity Model axes
- Upstream candidates separated from downstream readouts
- Competing explanations held in parallel, not collapsed
- Each claim graded by the strength of evidence behind it
The goal is a causal ordering, not a label. Where the ordering is uncertain, that uncertainty is written down.
What is delivered
- A written mechanistic narrative of the specific case
- Ranked candidate drivers with the reasoning shown
- Contradictions and unresolved questions, named
- Discussion points structured for the licensed care team
Educational analysis for clinician discussion. Implementation stays with your prescribers.
- Contradictions are preserved
A finding that does not fit the leading hypothesis is annotated rather than dropped. It is often the most informative part of a case.
- Evidence is tiered
Mechanistic, observational, and interventional support are marked separately, so nothing reads stronger than the literature allows.
- Records stay confidential
Case material is handled privately and is never used as public example content without explicit written permission.
How a mechanistic claim earns its place.
Nothing enters a written synthesis because it sounds plausible. Each mechanism proposed for your case is traced back to primary literature, graded by how directly that literature supports it, and paired with what would falsify it.
Mechanism, not label
A diagnosis names a pattern. The analysis asks what upstream failure would produce that pattern, and whether one failure explains several of your findings at once.
Traced to primary literature
Each proposed mechanism is anchored in published research, mapped in the public evidence maps rather than asserted privately.
Graded by strength
Well-replicated human evidence is distinguished from mechanistic inference and from animal or in-vitro work. Weak support is labelled weak.
Competing hypotheses, side by side
More than one explanation is carried forward until the record distinguishes them. Findings that contradict the leading reading are listed, not dropped.
Leverage points for clinician discussion
The output names where intervening upstream could matter most, written as questions and options your clinicians can evaluate.
Stated so it can be wrong
Every reading names what would contradict it. A framework that cannot be falsified is not doing analytical work.
Comprehensive Systems-Biology Case Analysis
- Fee
- $850 USD
- Live session
- 60–90 minutes
- Written synthesis
- Within 10 business days
- Clarification
- 4 weeks by email
A substantial new batch of testing, or a major re-reading of the case, is separate paid re-analysis. Full scope, inclusions and exclusions →
Working with BiomeLogic from outside the United States
BiomeLogic is not a country-specific service and there is no separate international offering. The same work is delivered the same way wherever you are.
- How it runs
- Remote (video call) — asynchronous written analysis plus one live session. Nothing depends on you being in the same place, or awake at the same time, as anyone else.
- Scheduling the live session
- The workable scheduling window has not been published. Rather than imply a coverage claim that has not been confirmed, times are agreed directly with you when the session is booked.
- Fees and payment
- Fees are charged in USD ($850). Payment route: Stripe, which accepts international cards. Your bank’s conversion and any card fees are outside BiomeLogic’s control.
- Jurisdiction and scope
- Educational analysis and a personalized intervention framework for your medical team to review—not diagnosis, prescribing, medical supervision, or emergency care. That boundary does not change by country: no clinical care is provided in any jurisdiction, nothing is prescribed anywhere, and no clinician–patient relationship is created.
- Who the written output is for
- The written synthesis is written to be read by your own licensed clinician, wherever they practise. It is discussion material for that conversation, not an instruction to them or to you.
What this is not.
BiomeLogic does not replace your clinical team. The analysis produced in a consultation is mechanistic and educational: it describes what the evidence suggests may be driving a picture, what would distinguish one explanation from another, and which intervention targets follow from it. BiomeLogic may identify and organize potential intervention options — nutritional, supplemental, behavioral or other mechanistically relevant strategies — for educational and research discussion with your licensed healthcare team. BiomeLogic does not diagnose disease, prescribe, authorise, or medically supervise treatment. Anything acted on — medications, supplements, dose changes, monitoring — is decided, authorised and supervised by your licensed clinicians.
Every consultation is analysed personally, so the work is done one case at a time. If your case has outpaced what your current team can analyse, the door begins at Gate 1.