The Host Capacity Model, as a systems map.
The same cascade as the canonical framework page, presented as a clickable systems-biology map. Each node opens a short definition, mechanism summary, related articles, and the uncertainty associated with that layer. For a dynamical view of the same model — phase portrait, basin pull, and the cascade step by step — open the living simulator.
The Host Capacity Model — interactive
Click a node to read its definition, mechanism summary, related articles, and the uncertainty associated with it. This is an educational systems-biology map, not a diagnostic tool.
9 closed-loop extensions
The linear cascade above describes direction. These loops describe why the state can persist: each one closes back on an upstream node. Educational systems-biology reasoning — hypotheses and mechanisms, not diagnostic criteria.
The motility / bile-acid loop
Why SIBO may recur after successful eradication: the signal that sets transit time is itself microbially produced.
- 1.Host capacity falls
- 2.Community shifts toward facultative anaerobes
- 3.7α-dehydroxylation declines — secondary bile acids deplete
- 4.TGR5 on enteroendocrine L-cells under-stimulated
- 5.GLP-1 / PYY release drops — ileal brake weakens
- 6.MMC phase III disrupted, stasis
- 7.SIBO recurrence
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Restoring colonocyte substrate capacity so obligate anaerobes regain habitat
- — Addressing FXR–FGF19–CYP7A1 dysregulation where bile-acid spillover is documented
- — Motility support as a bridge rather than a stand-alone answer
Bile-acid panels are poorly standardised and transit time confounds the profile; this loop is a mechanistic hypothesis, not a validated clinical pathway.
The mitochondrial-pressure loop
Why the cascade may become self-sustaining: the metabolites produced by the shifted community can constrain the host respiration needed to reverse it.
- 1.Oxygen gradient destabilises
- 2.Enterobacteriaceae and Desulfovibrio expand
- 3.Succinate and H₂S rise in the lumen
- 4.Complex IV inhibition; HIF-1α stabilisation
- 5.Colonocytes locked toward aerobic glycolysis
- 6.OXPHOS recovery suppressed — gradient cannot be restored
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Lowering sulfide substrate load where a sulfide pattern is evident
- — Supporting mitochondrial cofactor availability alongside, not instead of, ecology work
- — Sequencing: antimicrobial pressure alone does not address the bioenergetic constraint
Luminal succinate and H₂S concentrations are rarely measured clinically, and human thresholds for Complex IV inhibition are not well defined.
The matrix / neuroimmune loop (MCAS & hEDS)
Why the MCAS–hypermobility overlap may be mechanistic rather than coincidental: protease signalling acts on both the barrier and the scaffold.
- 1.Microbial antigen translocation
- 2.Mast-cell degranulation — tryptase release
- 3.PAR-2 cleavage → MLCK phosphorylation → tight junctions pulled open
- 4.MMP-9 release degrades collagen and extracellular matrix
- 5.Vagal afferent terminals lose mechanosensory context
- 6.Gut–brain uncoupling; further immune disinhibition
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Reducing the translocating antigen load upstream of mast cells
- — Recognising hEDS-spectrum collagen fragility as a modifier, not the primary lesion
- — Autonomic work where cholinergic anti-inflammatory tone is clearly depleted
Tryptase and MMP-9 measures are timing-sensitive and non-specific; the hEDS–MCAS association is well described clinically but mechanistically unsettled.
The H₂S threshold loop (SQR bottleneck)
Why the same sulfide load may be fuel in one gut and metabolic arrest in another: the switch is the host's Q-pool redox state, not the sulfide level alone.
- 1.Electron-transport flux slows; CoQ pool stays reduced
- 2.SQR loses oxidised CoQ and sulfide oxidation stalls
- 3.H₂S accumulates in the mitochondrial matrix
- 4.Complex IV inhibited — respiration falls further
- 5.Oxygen consumption drops; lumen pO₂ rises
- 6.Sulfate reducers expand — more H₂S into a less capable epithelium
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Restoring electron-transport flux so SQR regains oxidised CoQ, rather than only lowering sulfide substrate
- — Reducing sulfide load as a temporary decompression step where a sulfide pattern is evident
- — Recognising the non-linear threshold: dose responses may be state-dependent, not linear
Human SQR capacity and colonic H₂S concentrations are not clinically measurable; the biphasic threshold is inferred from ex-vivo and animal data.
The nitrosative Fe–S lock-in loop
Why feeding butyrate may not restart hypoxia: peroxynitrite can dismantle the enzymes that burn it.
- 1.LPS reaches lamina propria; macrophage iNOS raises nitric oxide
- 2.Strained mitochondria leak superoxide
- 3.Peroxynitrite forms and attacks exposed 4Fe–4S clusters
- 4.Aconitase and Complex II inactivated (4Fe–4S → 3Fe–4S)
- 5.β-oxidation of butyrate cannot proceed
- 6.Oxygen consumption falls; barrier strains; more LPS translocates
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Lowering nitrosative and endotoxin load before expecting substrate strategies to work
- — Supporting Fe–S / CIA assembly cofactors as a candidate enabling step
- — Sequencing: repair the machinery before increasing the fuel
Peroxynitrite and cluster status cannot be measured in practice; this loop is a mechanistic hypothesis built on redox chemistry and surrogate markers.
The HIF-1α fragmentation loop (PHD / succinate)
Why barrier signalling becomes contradictory rather than simply switched off: oxygen and succinate push the same enzymes in opposite directions.
- 1.Colonocyte oxygen consumption falls; epithelial pO₂ rises
- 2.PHDs activate and degrade HIF-1α via VHL/proteasome
- 3.Tight-junction and mucus programmes lose transcriptional support
- 4.Complex II failure raises intracellular succinate
- 5.Succinate competitively inhibits the same PHDs
- 6.Fragmented HIF signalling — barrier repair never fully commits
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Targeting the succinate:α-KG ratio as a candidate lever on barrier stability
- — Restoring Complex II function rather than treating the barrier symptomatically
- — Reading conflicting barrier markers as signal fragmentation, not measurement error
Intracellular metabolite ratios are inaccessible clinically; the relative weight of oxygen versus succinate control of PHDs in human colon is unresolved.
The glial bridge loop (ATP → S100B → mast cells)
Why mast-cell reactivity and motility chaos may be one phenomenon: enteric glia translate epithelial energy failure into neuro-immune output.
- 1.Colonocyte ATP depletion; pannexin release of extracellular ATP
- 2.Enteric glial P2X7 activation and reactive gliosis
- 3.S100B secretion; RAGE engagement on mast cells and enteric neurons
- 4.Mast-cell degranulation threshold lowered — mediator volatility
- 5.ENS hyper-excitability — alternating stasis and spasm
- 6.Transit instability re-shapes habitat and re-loads the epithelium
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Treating epithelial bioenergetics as upstream of mast-cell threshold work
- — Mediator-stabilising measures as symptom containment, not as the correction
- — Motility support timed to glial-inflammatory quiescence rather than applied continuously
Mucosal S100B and glial activation are research-grade endpoints; human evidence is biopsy- and model-based rather than prospective.
The FXR / FGF19 checkpoint loop
Why bile-acid chemistry may enforce the dysbiosis it followed: the host's antimicrobial programme is commissioned by microbes it no longer has.
- 1.Oxygen gradient fails; obligate anaerobes decline
- 2.7α-dehydroxylation drops — secondary bile acids fall
- 3.FXR signalling quietens on colonocytes
- 4.Antimicrobial peptide output (angiogenin, RegIIIγ) falls — Proteobacteria expand
- 5.FGF19 falls; hepatic CYP7A1 unrestrained
- 6.Primary bile-acid spillover — detergent stress, secretory diarrhoea, further mitochondrial injury
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Restoring habitat for 7α-dehydroxylating anaerobes rather than suppressing overgrowth alone
- — Managing bile-acid spillover where it is documented, as decompression while capacity recovers
- — Interpreting recurrent Proteobacteria expansion as a checkpoint failure, not a treatment failure
FGF19 and faecal bile-acid panels are poorly standardised; the antimicrobial-peptide arm of FXR signalling is better established in models than in patients.
The DBH redox trap (dopamine / norepinephrine split)
Why motility and autonomic symptoms may move together: one enzyme, stalled locally by redox collapse, splits the catecholamine pathway in two directions.
- 1.Chronic mucosal inflammation oxidises local ascorbate
- 2.DBH loses the co-reductant that recycles its copper centres
- 3.Microbial HPHPA adds competitive inhibition
- 4.Dopamine pools in the gut wall
- 5.D2-receptor inhibition of motility — stasis, SIBO persistence
- 6.Systemic norepinephrine shortfall — orthostatic and dysautonomic symptoms
- ↺loop closes on host capacity
- — Restoring mucosal redox capacity as a prerequisite to catecholamine balance
- — Addressing HPHPA-producing organisms where organic-acid patterns support it
- — Reading gut stasis and orthostatic intolerance as one node, not two problems
Tissue ascorbate redox state and enteric catecholamine ratios are not clinically measurable; this loop is inferred from enzymology and organic-acid patterns.
Layer 1 at biophysical resolution
The motility node resolved to the level of ion channels, junction geometry, motor proteins, and chromatin state — the SIP syncytium, ANO1 pacing and Cx43 uncoupling, the IP₃R–ANO1 nano-junction, Piezo2 and S-nitrosylation, muscularis macrophage–ENS crosstalk, neuropod synaptic shearing, and c-Kit niche silencing.
Read Layer 1: Neuro-Mechanical Motility & Transit Vectors →Gate 1 is only a fit screen. No labs or files are required.
Educational systems-biology consulting. Not diagnosis or treatment. Designed to work alongside your licensed medical team.