Systems map

The Host Capacity Model, as a systems map.

The same cascade as the canonical framework page, presented as a clickable systems-biology map. Each node opens a short definition, mechanism summary, related articles, and the uncertainty associated with that layer. For a dynamical view of the same model — phase portrait, basin pull, and the cascade step by step — open the living simulator.

Host Capacity Model — causal cascadeLinear cascade from colonocyte bioenergetic failure through oxygen-gradient instability, microbial habitat shift, endotoxin and metabolite stress, gut barrier strain, immune and mast-cell activation, ending in systemic symptoms. Curved dashed feedback arcs show inflammation increasing energy demand, dysbiosis increasing metabolite stress, mast-cell activation worsening motility, and mitochondrial stress lowering host capacity.ColonocytebioenergeticsO₂gradientHabitatshiftEndotoxin /metabolitesGutbarrierImmune /mast cellsSystemicsymptomsDASHED ARCS = FEEDBACK LOOPS · BIOMELOGIC.NET
Linear cascade with feedback loops. Dashed arcs mark host-side feedbacks: inflammation increasing energy demand, dysbiosis increasing metabolite stress, mast-cell activation worsening motility, and mitochondrial stress lowering host capacity.
Systems map

The Host Capacity Model — interactive

Click a node to read its definition, mechanism summary, related articles, and the uncertainty associated with it. This is an educational systems-biology map, not a diagnostic tool.

Extended model

9 closed-loop extensions

The linear cascade above describes direction. These loops describe why the state can persist: each one closes back on an upstream node. Educational systems-biology reasoning — hypotheses and mechanisms, not diagnostic criteria.

The motility / bile-acid loop

Why SIBO may recur after successful eradication: the signal that sets transit time is itself microbially produced.

  1. 1.Host capacity falls
  2. 2.Community shifts toward facultative anaerobes
  3. 3.7α-dehydroxylation declines — secondary bile acids deplete
  4. 4.TGR5 on enteroendocrine L-cells under-stimulated
  5. 5.GLP-1 / PYY release drops — ileal brake weakens
  6. 6.MMC phase III disrupted, stasis
  7. 7.SIBO recurrence
  8. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Restoring colonocyte substrate capacity so obligate anaerobes regain habitat
  • — Addressing FXR–FGF19–CYP7A1 dysregulation where bile-acid spillover is documented
  • — Motility support as a bridge rather than a stand-alone answer
Uncertainty

Bile-acid panels are poorly standardised and transit time confounds the profile; this loop is a mechanistic hypothesis, not a validated clinical pathway.

The mitochondrial-pressure loop

Why the cascade may become self-sustaining: the metabolites produced by the shifted community can constrain the host respiration needed to reverse it.

  1. 1.Oxygen gradient destabilises
  2. 2.Enterobacteriaceae and Desulfovibrio expand
  3. 3.Succinate and H₂S rise in the lumen
  4. 4.Complex IV inhibition; HIF-1α stabilisation
  5. 5.Colonocytes locked toward aerobic glycolysis
  6. 6.OXPHOS recovery suppressed — gradient cannot be restored
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Lowering sulfide substrate load where a sulfide pattern is evident
  • — Supporting mitochondrial cofactor availability alongside, not instead of, ecology work
  • — Sequencing: antimicrobial pressure alone does not address the bioenergetic constraint
Uncertainty

Luminal succinate and H₂S concentrations are rarely measured clinically, and human thresholds for Complex IV inhibition are not well defined.

The matrix / neuroimmune loop (MCAS & hEDS)

Why the MCAS–hypermobility overlap may be mechanistic rather than coincidental: protease signalling acts on both the barrier and the scaffold.

  1. 1.Microbial antigen translocation
  2. 2.Mast-cell degranulation — tryptase release
  3. 3.PAR-2 cleavage → MLCK phosphorylation → tight junctions pulled open
  4. 4.MMP-9 release degrades collagen and extracellular matrix
  5. 5.Vagal afferent terminals lose mechanosensory context
  6. 6.Gut–brain uncoupling; further immune disinhibition
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Reducing the translocating antigen load upstream of mast cells
  • — Recognising hEDS-spectrum collagen fragility as a modifier, not the primary lesion
  • — Autonomic work where cholinergic anti-inflammatory tone is clearly depleted
Uncertainty

Tryptase and MMP-9 measures are timing-sensitive and non-specific; the hEDS–MCAS association is well described clinically but mechanistically unsettled.

The H₂S threshold loop (SQR bottleneck)

Why the same sulfide load may be fuel in one gut and metabolic arrest in another: the switch is the host's Q-pool redox state, not the sulfide level alone.

  1. 1.Electron-transport flux slows; CoQ pool stays reduced
  2. 2.SQR loses oxidised CoQ and sulfide oxidation stalls
  3. 3.H₂S accumulates in the mitochondrial matrix
  4. 4.Complex IV inhibited — respiration falls further
  5. 5.Oxygen consumption drops; lumen pO₂ rises
  6. 6.Sulfate reducers expand — more H₂S into a less capable epithelium
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Restoring electron-transport flux so SQR regains oxidised CoQ, rather than only lowering sulfide substrate
  • — Reducing sulfide load as a temporary decompression step where a sulfide pattern is evident
  • — Recognising the non-linear threshold: dose responses may be state-dependent, not linear
Uncertainty

Human SQR capacity and colonic H₂S concentrations are not clinically measurable; the biphasic threshold is inferred from ex-vivo and animal data.

The nitrosative Fe–S lock-in loop

Why feeding butyrate may not restart hypoxia: peroxynitrite can dismantle the enzymes that burn it.

  1. 1.LPS reaches lamina propria; macrophage iNOS raises nitric oxide
  2. 2.Strained mitochondria leak superoxide
  3. 3.Peroxynitrite forms and attacks exposed 4Fe–4S clusters
  4. 4.Aconitase and Complex II inactivated (4Fe–4S → 3Fe–4S)
  5. 5.β-oxidation of butyrate cannot proceed
  6. 6.Oxygen consumption falls; barrier strains; more LPS translocates
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Lowering nitrosative and endotoxin load before expecting substrate strategies to work
  • — Supporting Fe–S / CIA assembly cofactors as a candidate enabling step
  • — Sequencing: repair the machinery before increasing the fuel
Uncertainty

Peroxynitrite and cluster status cannot be measured in practice; this loop is a mechanistic hypothesis built on redox chemistry and surrogate markers.

The HIF-1α fragmentation loop (PHD / succinate)

Why barrier signalling becomes contradictory rather than simply switched off: oxygen and succinate push the same enzymes in opposite directions.

  1. 1.Colonocyte oxygen consumption falls; epithelial pO₂ rises
  2. 2.PHDs activate and degrade HIF-1α via VHL/proteasome
  3. 3.Tight-junction and mucus programmes lose transcriptional support
  4. 4.Complex II failure raises intracellular succinate
  5. 5.Succinate competitively inhibits the same PHDs
  6. 6.Fragmented HIF signalling — barrier repair never fully commits
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Targeting the succinate:α-KG ratio as a candidate lever on barrier stability
  • — Restoring Complex II function rather than treating the barrier symptomatically
  • — Reading conflicting barrier markers as signal fragmentation, not measurement error
Uncertainty

Intracellular metabolite ratios are inaccessible clinically; the relative weight of oxygen versus succinate control of PHDs in human colon is unresolved.

The glial bridge loop (ATP → S100B → mast cells)

Why mast-cell reactivity and motility chaos may be one phenomenon: enteric glia translate epithelial energy failure into neuro-immune output.

  1. 1.Colonocyte ATP depletion; pannexin release of extracellular ATP
  2. 2.Enteric glial P2X7 activation and reactive gliosis
  3. 3.S100B secretion; RAGE engagement on mast cells and enteric neurons
  4. 4.Mast-cell degranulation threshold lowered — mediator volatility
  5. 5.ENS hyper-excitability — alternating stasis and spasm
  6. 6.Transit instability re-shapes habitat and re-loads the epithelium
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Treating epithelial bioenergetics as upstream of mast-cell threshold work
  • — Mediator-stabilising measures as symptom containment, not as the correction
  • — Motility support timed to glial-inflammatory quiescence rather than applied continuously
Uncertainty

Mucosal S100B and glial activation are research-grade endpoints; human evidence is biopsy- and model-based rather than prospective.

The FXR / FGF19 checkpoint loop

Why bile-acid chemistry may enforce the dysbiosis it followed: the host's antimicrobial programme is commissioned by microbes it no longer has.

  1. 1.Oxygen gradient fails; obligate anaerobes decline
  2. 2.7α-dehydroxylation drops — secondary bile acids fall
  3. 3.FXR signalling quietens on colonocytes
  4. 4.Antimicrobial peptide output (angiogenin, RegIIIγ) falls — Proteobacteria expand
  5. 5.FGF19 falls; hepatic CYP7A1 unrestrained
  6. 6.Primary bile-acid spillover — detergent stress, secretory diarrhoea, further mitochondrial injury
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Restoring habitat for 7α-dehydroxylating anaerobes rather than suppressing overgrowth alone
  • — Managing bile-acid spillover where it is documented, as decompression while capacity recovers
  • — Interpreting recurrent Proteobacteria expansion as a checkpoint failure, not a treatment failure
Uncertainty

FGF19 and faecal bile-acid panels are poorly standardised; the antimicrobial-peptide arm of FXR signalling is better established in models than in patients.

The DBH redox trap (dopamine / norepinephrine split)

Why motility and autonomic symptoms may move together: one enzyme, stalled locally by redox collapse, splits the catecholamine pathway in two directions.

  1. 1.Chronic mucosal inflammation oxidises local ascorbate
  2. 2.DBH loses the co-reductant that recycles its copper centres
  3. 3.Microbial HPHPA adds competitive inhibition
  4. 4.Dopamine pools in the gut wall
  5. 5.D2-receptor inhibition of motility — stasis, SIBO persistence
  6. 6.Systemic norepinephrine shortfall — orthostatic and dysautonomic symptoms
  7. ↺loop closes on host capacity
Candidate leverage points
  • — Restoring mucosal redox capacity as a prerequisite to catecholamine balance
  • — Addressing HPHPA-producing organisms where organic-acid patterns support it
  • — Reading gut stasis and orthostatic intolerance as one node, not two problems
Uncertainty

Tissue ascorbate redox state and enteric catecholamine ratios are not clinically measurable; this loop is inferred from enzymology and organic-acid patterns.

Deep dive

Layer 1 at biophysical resolution

The motility node resolved to the level of ion channels, junction geometry, motor proteins, and chromatin state — the SIP syncytium, ANO1 pacing and Cx43 uncoupling, the IP₃R–ANO1 nano-junction, Piezo2 and S-nitrosylation, muscularis macrophage–ENS crosstalk, neuropod synaptic shearing, and c-Kit niche silencing.

Read Layer 1: Neuro-Mechanical Motility & Transit Vectors →

Gate 1 is only a fit screen. No labs or files are required.

Educational systems-biology consulting. Not diagnosis or treatment. Designed to work alongside your licensed medical team.