Neuroimmune, small-fiber and sensory–autonomic patterns
For burning, numbness and autonomic sensory change with equivocal testing, where the neurological and immune readings have never been reconciled.
This page is for people with neuropathic and sensory symptoms that sit at the border of neurology and immunology: burning feet, patchy numbness, temperature and sweating change, biopsy or autonomic testing that came back equivocal, and antibody or channel findings whose significance nobody has agreed on. Neurological diagnosis is not within scope. Reconstructing how the neuroimmune picture fits the rest of the record is.
What records in this area tend to contain
These are descriptions of records, not diagnostic criteria. Recognising several of them does not mean you have a condition, and none of them is being asserted about you.
- Burning, tingling, or allodynic symptoms in a non-length-dependent or patchy distribution
- Sweating, temperature, or vasomotor changes alongside sensory symptoms
- Skin biopsy, QSART, or autonomic reflex testing with borderline or conflicting results
- Autoantibody or channel-antibody findings of uncertain clinical weight
- Onset after infection, or alongside autonomic and reactivity symptoms
- Immunotherapy raised as a possibility without a clear mechanistic case for it
The analytical work on a case like this
- Symptom distribution and chronology mapped against infectious and immune events
- Every neurological and immunological result, with an explicit statement of what each supports
- Metabolic contributors — glucose handling, B12, thyroid — that are common and correctable
- Post-infectious neuroimmune hypotheses, graded rather than assumed
- Mitochondrial and microvascular contributors where the record supports them
- Overlap with autonomic and mast-cell findings elsewhere in the case
What the work is trying to answer
These are the questions the reconstruction is built around. They are questions, not promises — some records answer them clearly and some do not, and the written synthesis says which.
- How much of the picture is explained by findings already in the record?
- Which equivocal results are genuinely equivocal, and which were collected suboptimally?
- Is there a correctable metabolic contributor that the immune framing has overshadowed?
- What would a neurologist most usefully be asked next, and why?
What would argue against the leading reading
Every synthesis states the alternatives it could not exclude. For this area, the most important ones are:
- Metabolic neuropathy from glucose handling, B12, or thyroid status
- Compressive, structural, or central causes requiring imaging rather than mechanism
- Central sensitisation, where the peripheral nerve is not the origin
- A systemic autoimmune disease not yet formally assessed
- Medication-induced neuropathy, including from agents used for other symptoms
BiomeLogic does not diagnose small-fiber neuropathy or any neurological condition, does not interpret biopsy or electrophysiology as a diagnostic act, and does not recommend immunotherapy, IVIG, or any treatment. Neurological assessment belongs with a neurologist.
Mohammed Attallah is the founder of BiomeLogic and developed the Host Capacity Model independently; it is a working framework, not medical consensus or a clinically validated instrument. He is not a licensed clinician. Every output is educational analysis prepared for review, modification, or rejection by your own medical team. Full scope statement →
The service is chosen by scope, not by condition
There is no separate price for any pattern on this page. Gate 1 is free, takes a few minutes, needs no files, and ends with a written reply about whether the analysis suits your case and which engagement would fit.
Comprehensive Systems-Biology Case Analysis
$995The whole case: full-record reconstruction, a live working session, and a written synthesis with an intervention discussion framework.
Read the full scope →Complex Case Deep Dive
$1,500Unusually extensive or internally contradictory records needing expanded chronology and cross-test reconciliation. Scope, not a better method.
Read the full scope →
Related reading on this site
POTS, dysautonomia and autonomic–GI overlap
For cases where standing, eating and digesting have become the same problem, and the autonomic label has not explained why it began.
Long COVID and post-infectious syndromes
For illness that began with an infection and did not end with it, where the honest position is several competing hypotheses rather than one story.
hEDS, hypermobility and autonomic–GI overlap
For hypermobility with dysautonomia, dysmotility and reactivity, where three labels exist and no explanation connects them.